Harry, you wonderful boy. You brave, brave man

Have literally spent the last 4 hours reading Merlin fics.

Regret nothing. 

court4short:

amandaonwriting:

An entire chapter of Harry Potter written under the stairs.

Ooooooh

court4short:

amandaonwriting:

An entire chapter of Harry Potter written under the stairs.

Ooooooh

(via sacredkarcram)

urlsquatter:

I forgot the word “reindeer” today so I described them as “Christmas llamas” why

(via thefadingcheshire)

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

p4wsitive:

fir3:

an-otter-and-a-hedgehog:

aslytherinsuperwholockian:

theemurg:

thebakerswifelovesstarkid:

shaymae:

ikickdownthewalls:

thermaflutasteslikeshit:

nomatch4maicodez:

the-paranoid-humanoid:

pyromau5:

ianistheheroitshim:

veryadorabull:

kachoomoo:

deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan:

hellsdescent:

heysammy:

Instant reblog.

stop what you’re doing and watch

Not reblogging this is a federal offense. 

<3

I can understand if you don’t reblog this. It just means you are not a man.

 this will make a man out of me

I’m never gonna catch my breath when I see this on my dash.

I love this movie so freaking much.

always reblog, no questions asked.

Fuck they establish so much in one stupid montage and it’s so beautiful and no one can question is because it’s done so beautifully!

FACBOOK IS UNSUITED FOR THE RAGE OF WAR

YOU HAVE TO REBLOG THIS!

I wonder if Disney knows they had young girls perfectly content to grow up and become a man due to this song

i HAD to. sorry not sorry.

OH MY GAWSH. I JUST HAD TOO. THIS PART OF THE MOVIE <3 LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVEEEE

(Source: 90sjamz, via thefadingcheshire)

thebookofmusicals:

Les Misérables (2012)

(via amynta)

thefadingcheshire:

korralations:

rcnano13:

korrashorts:

askchibikorra:

Papaaaaaaaaa!! 8D

SO CUTE, ♥♥♥ /dead

I re-blogged this before but it’s too damn CUTE to not re-blog again. :D

Can’t.

I honestly can’t handle how adorable this is.

CHIBI KORRA IS THE MOST ADORABLE BLOG OKAY

fairestcharming:

The life and times of James Potter and Lily Evans;

The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death

(via itatemyhand)

diarycrux:

G E N D E R S W A P | the golden trio

kaya scodelario as harley potternatalya rudakova as ronnie weasleyhunter parrish as hermes granger 

diarycrux:

G E N D E R S W A P | the golden trio

kaya scodelario as harley potter
natalya rudakova as ronnie weasley
hunter parrish as hermes granger 

(via thefadingcheshire)

dragonsroar:

hetero

yuri

yaoi

nonshippers

long ago the four nations lived together in harmony

then, everything changed when the yaoi nation attacked

(via sacredkarcram)

in-the-midst-of-winter:

How the media skews everything: A lesson.
So from this title we automatically understand that an Israeli has been innocently killed by a Palestinian gunman (but let’s guess who had more arms, eh?), and with that very superficial understanding of the story, we go into the rest of the story with the idea that ‘Palestinians are gunman, Israeli’s are defending themselves’ surreptitiously nesting in our heads.

The military said it opened fire on an armed Palestinian militant who was attempting to cross into Israel and shot one of its soldiers.

says the LA Times. Still probably not the most accurate paper, but at least we’re getting somewhere.
It seems to be the case that it’s not quite as simple as the BBC would have us make out. It’s unclear whether this Palestinian was shot at first by a group of Israeli soldiers — who retain the right to shoot at anyone, armed or unarmed, who approach the fence — or he actually did shoot at them first.

Israeli military sources said that its forces were in action in the air and on the ground. According to unconfirmed reports, a vehicle was hit and at least three militants killed.

says the Guardian. Wait what!? We’ve jumped a little huh? Israel is met with a lone ‘gunman’ and so they start shelling a small area in the south of Gaza? WAT. Of course, as much as they’d like you not to know, shelling is indiscriminate, so these so called ‘militants’ (as if they’re easily identifiable from many miles away while you fire mortars and whatever else) mightn’t actually be militants at all. They could be, and most likely are, just men, women and children of Gaza, who’ve been under siege for far to long.

Smoke billows from the Gaza Strip as an Israeli army tank monitors the area…

A lone gunman met with tanks, aerial attacks, shelling and undoubtedly footsoldiers: seems a legitimate attempt at defence, huh?

The gunman is more likely to have been a member of Islamic Jihad or the Popular Resistance Committees than Hamas, which largely adheres to a ceasefire.

None of this shit is as simple as the media would like you to think. Wake up and smell the coffee. Israel is a dictatorial entity looming over the heads of the Palestinian people, with the support and aid of the international community.
Shall I wrap it up how a media outlet might?
“Palestinian breaks through cage to the welcoming of gunfire, shelling and aerial strikes.”

in-the-midst-of-winter:

How the media skews everything: A lesson.

So from this title we automatically understand that an Israeli has been innocently killed by a Palestinian gunman (but let’s guess who had more arms, eh?), and with that very superficial understanding of the story, we go into the rest of the story with the idea that ‘Palestinians are gunman, Israeli’s are defending themselves’ surreptitiously nesting in our heads.

The military said it opened fire on an armed Palestinian militant who was attempting to cross into Israel and shot one of its soldiers.

says the LA Times. Still probably not the most accurate paper, but at least we’re getting somewhere.

It seems to be the case that it’s not quite as simple as the BBC would have us make out. It’s unclear whether this Palestinian was shot at first by a group of Israeli soldiers — who retain the right to shoot at anyone, armed or unarmed, who approach the fence — or he actually did shoot at them first.

Israeli military sources said that its forces were in action in the air and on the ground. According to unconfirmed reports, a vehicle was hit and at least three militants killed.

says the Guardian. Wait what!? We’ve jumped a little huh? Israel is met with a lone ‘gunman’ and so they start shelling a small area in the south of Gaza? WAT. Of course, as much as they’d like you not to know, shelling is indiscriminate, so these so called ‘militants’ (as if they’re easily identifiable from many miles away while you fire mortars and whatever else) mightn’t actually be militants at all. They could be, and most likely are, just men, women and children of Gaza, who’ve been under siege for far to long.

Smoke billows from the Gaza Strip as an Israeli army tank monitors the area…

A lone gunman met with tanks, aerial attacks, shelling and undoubtedly footsoldiers: seems a legitimate attempt at defence, huh?

The gunman is more likely to have been a member of Islamic Jihad or the Popular Resistance Committees than Hamas, which largely adheres to a ceasefire.

None of this shit is as simple as the media would like you to think. Wake up and smell the coffee. Israel is a dictatorial entity looming over the heads of the Palestinian people, with the support and aid of the international community.

Shall I wrap it up how a media outlet might?

“Palestinian breaks through cage to the welcoming of gunfire, shelling and aerial strikes.”

(via unfortunately-itwasparadise)

(Source: liamm-payne, via thefadingcheshire)

kateelliottsff:

I don’t know anything about this but I love it so much.

(Source: im-not-even-mad)

mynightmaresareaboutlosingyou:

How can a man like John Green write something as gut-wrenchingly heart-breaking as tfios 

and then throw himself against a wall to test if he is an octopus

just

how

(via thefadingcheshire)

sneadly:

WHY ARE BOOKS NOT WATERPROOF 

I WANT TO READ IN THE SHOWER 

(via thefadingcheshire)

1 day ago with:6,752 notes (originallysneadly)
retro-dolls:

altanjames:

Ginta Lapina

Omg young Ginta. 

retro-dolls:

altanjames:

Ginta Lapina

Omg young Ginta. 

(via fa-int)